• Home
  • Products
    Urology
    Hepatobiliology
    Airway Management
    Accessories
  • News
    Company News
    Exhibitions & Events
  • Publications
    Ureteroscope
  • About
    Development History
    Marketing Worldwide
    Honor
    Love & Responsibility
  • Contact
    Contact us & Feedback
    Benefits & Rewards
    Grow with PUSEN
  • 中 | Global | US
中 | US
  • Home
  • Products
  • News
  • Publications
  • About
  • Contact
Which sucks more? Comparison of two novel direct-in-scope suction ureteroscopes......
Date: 2025-08-20 Click: 53

E0B6E6C4-D9D4-4eb6-AF68-2F6C2EB989FC 拷贝.png


Authors: Zhamshid Okhunov, Elizabeth A Baldwin, Daniel Jhang, Ruben Crew, Ninous Betdashtoo, Kallan Richards, Grant Sajdak, Joshua Ghoulian, D Duane Baldwin 


Abstract


Introduction: Novel Direct-ln-Scope-Suction ureteroscopes (DlSS-U) have recently been introduced to facilitate removal of small stone fragments. The purpose of this study was to compare two novel DlSS-U to a conventional ureteroscope to determine efficiency for suctioning fluid and stone dust at different deflection angles.


Methods: Three disposable ureteroscopes were evaluated, including two DISS-U with 5.1-Fr and a 3.6-Fr channels, and  were compared to a conventional ureteroscope with 3.6-Fr channel. For DISS-U trials, a conventional suction system was  set at maximal settings and tested at deflection of 0, 90, and 140°, to simulate upper, interpolar, and lower pole kidney stone  evacuation under 3 conditions (empty channel, 2.2-Fr basket, and 0.038 guidewire). For the conventional ureteroscope, suctioning was performed manually using a 60-mL Luer lock syringe. Five trials were performed to measure the time in seconds  to remove 1 gram of CaOx density BegoStones (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mm) and 50-mL of saline.


Results: The 5.1-Fr DISS-U was the only scope that evacuated 0.5 mm stone fragments and evacuated them significantly  faster from the upper and interpole compared to the lower pole (111.0±27.7, 128.0±29.1, and 377.7±63.4 s at 0, 90, and  140°, respectively; p<0.002). The 5.1-Fr DISS-U evacuated 1 g of dust faster than the 3.6 DISS-U and conventional ureteroscope at all angles (p<0.007). The 5.1-Fr DISS-U and the 3.6-Fr DISS-U required less suction time for 50 mL of saline  compared to the conventional ureteroscope at all angles (p<0.001 for all). Using a 2.2-Fr basket increased suction time by  66.0% (p<0.001) for the 3.6-Fr DISS-U and by 44% (p<0.001) for the 5.1-Fr DISS-U, while the 0.038 guidewire increased  suction time by 96% and 111%, respectively (p<0.001). No ureteroscope was able to suction 1 mm stone fragments without  clogging.


Keywords: Direct in scope suction; Lithotripsy; Ureteroscopy; Urolithiasis.



Literature Link >>>



Products
  • Urology
  • Hepatobiliology
  • Airway Management
  • Accessories
News
  • Company News
  • Exhibitions & Events
Science
  • Ureteroscope
About
  • Development History
  • Marketing Worldwide
  • Honor
  • Love & Responsibility
Contact
  • Contact us & Feedback
  • Benefits & Rewards
  • Grow with PUSEN

Follow us to learn more
about the latest news

5/F, Building 1, No 33, Keji San Road,

High-tech Zone, Tangjiawan Town,

519085 Zhuhai, Guangdong, People's Republic of China

(86) 400-688-2023

pusen@pusenmedical.com


©2023 Zhuhai Pusen Medical Technology Co., Ltd.  All Rights Reserved  
 互联网药品信息服务资格证书(粤)- 非经营性 - 2022 - 0297    粤ICP备18073173号-1    1710149628862846.png 
粤公网安备44049102496975号

反馈收集单